Care coordination, advance care planning, and even dental HIE are critical use cases for how health data interoperability can support patient-centered care delivery.
As the industry shifts to value-based payment models, concepts like patient-centered care are influencing all aspects of healthcare, including health data interoperability.
In patient-centered care, an individual’s specific health needs and desired health outcomes are the driving force behind all healthcare decisions, according to a 2017 NEJM Catalyst article.
“Patients are partners with their healthcare providers, and providers treat patients not only from a clinical perspective, but also from an emotional, mental, spiritual, social, and financial perspective,” the article noted.
By adopting health data standards and health information exchange (HIE), organizations are looking to promote interoperability of health information. Access to comprehensive patient data at the point of care helps providers tailor care delivery to unique patient needs and understand complex patient populations.
Advance Care Planning Interoperability
Adoption of Health Level 7 International (HL7) data standards could help move healthcare away from a world of primarily paper-based advance directives to support advance care planning interoperability, according to Maria Moen, senior vice president of innovation and external affairs at ADVault Inc.
Advance directive documents outline decisions a patient and her loved ones may make at the end of her life. These documents include living wills, healthcare power of attorney forms, and pre-hospital medical care directives, often referred to as Do Not Resuscitate orders (DNRs).
Provider access to accurate, up-to-date advance directive documents is critical in ensuring they meet patients’ end-of-life care wishes. However, these documents can sometimes get lost in translation due to industry data silos, leaving providers without crucial information to guide clinical decision-making.
That’s because these directives aren’t easily stored in the EHR, so it’s hard for providers to access them.
Moen noted that paper-based advance directive forms lead to numerous barriers, burdens, and adverse patient outcomes during care transitions, as providers may not have immediate access to patients’ end-of-life wishes at the bedside.
“Urgent treatment decisions are made at times, making immediate access to advance directives and advance care plan information essential to providing personalized, high-value care in the aging population,” Moen said in an interview with EHRIntelligence.
Moen has been a member of the HL7 patient empowerment workgroup since 2019 and serves as the HL7 project lead for the Advance Directive Interoperability with FHIR project (ADI with FHIR), which began in the fall of 2020.
The ADI with FHIR project focuses on creating implementation guides for the exchange of advance care plan information through standards-based application programming interfaces (APIs).
“Our project began with the creation, exchange, and verification of information authored by a patient,” Moen said. “We are moving into practitioner-authored data now to include portable medical orders for life-sustaining treatment and patient instructions such as DNR orders related to a procedure.”
The project focused on converting existing documents stored in clinical systems into a standardized format, as well as new documents written by an individual or a provider, Moen explained.
“Then, we focused on sharing that information outside the originating organization, whether with family and friends or with other providers during the transition of care,” she said. “We also paid specific attention to the verification of who created, authenticated, and signed the document.”
Moen said that the HL7 community completed an environmental scan to derive a comprehensive library of advance directives and personal advance care plan documents. Standardized vocabulary codes existed for some documents, while the workgroup needed to create codes to support data exchange in other instances.
Moen said that health IT systems must have a patient-directed process so that individuals can communicate information about their advance care goals to inform provider-generated care plans.
“Interoperable exchange of advance directive information enables practitioners to create person-centered treatment plans that align with the patient’s values and their quality-of-life priorities,” Moen said.
Vaultara allows for rapid, contact-less access to essential imaging data and improved efficiency.
Plus a reduction in operational costs associated with medical image sharing.
View a demo of Vaultara's self-hosted image sharing software, Flight.
Transitions of Care Interoperability
Health IT stakeholders are also working to advance interoperability between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists.
Just as a circle has 360 degrees, Holly Miller, MD, MBA, FHIMSS, chief medical officer of MedAllies, says data exchange needs to be a closed-loop process to enable care coordination.
That’s what she’s trying to accomplish with 360X, an ONC-backed effort looking to build data standards to enable coordinated and streamlined care between PCPs and specialists.
“360X specifications were created because the process of patient transitions of care, both transfers and referrals, continue to be fraught with risk of adverse events for the patient,” Miller, who is a part of the 360X work group, told EHRIntelligence in an interview.
For instance, when PCPs refer a patient to a specialty provider, they send along relevant health information to help the specialist manage the patient’s needs. However, the PCP usually does not get information back from the specialist related to the patient, leaving the PCP to manually track their patient’s treatment.
“Referrals can be difficult to track and require excessive manpower for providers and staff if they want to ensure that their patients receive their necessary care and don’t fall through the cracks,” Miller told EHRIntelligence in an interview. “Rather than manual tracking processes that may be missed or delayed, with 360X, every step is automated, so we always know what’s going on with the patient.”
The 360X process for a specialty referral begins with a PCP specifying the physician or the group whom they want the patient to see. That information is sent to the specialist along with the reason why the PCP is sending the patient, the urgency of the visit, and pertinent patient health data.
The specialty staff will review the request and accept or decline the notification based on whether the provider can see the patient in the timeframe that the PCP requested.
Miller noted that 360X specifications leverage FHIR scheduling, so that scheduling can be done immediately and the patient can leave the office with a specialist appointment. This limits the clinician burden of having to manually call the specialist office to set up an appointment.
Then, ideally the patient would present at the specialist appointment. This is what Miller referred to as “the happy path.”
“Clinical medicine is a push. When I’m sending a patient to another clinician, I want to send the information that I think is important for my colleague to be able to next manage the patient,” Miller said.
However, Miller noted that being able to pull data from sources is equally important.
“Say that the specialist doesn’t have every piece of information they felt they need,” she explained. “For example, the PCP may not have known the patient had a given test of interest to the specialist, the specialist may be able to pull that from somewhere else.”
This allows providers to streamline care coordination for more efficient care delivery.
“If a provider has recently done tests on the patient, there’s no need to redo the test, so you’re also reducing cost,” she said. “Most importantly, the patient doesn’t have to go through the inconvenience or discomfort of another test.”
As healthcare organizations look to advance value-based care delivery, ensuring health data interoperability will be paramount for patient-centered care.